Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11122750›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2000

The role of lipoprotein[a] in atherosclerosis.

J D Morrisett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J D MorrisettBaylor College of Medicine, The Methodist Hospital, A601, 6565 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA. morriset@bcm.tmc.edu
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies confirm and extend previous evidence that lipoprotein (Lp) plays a significant role in atherosclerosis and is one of the top five or six risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In Japanese patients, Lp levels and apo phenotypes are significant predictors for myocardial infarction. Lp levels are significantly higher in ischemic stroke patients than in controls. However, plasma concentrations of Lp are not predictive of ischemic cerebral infarction in either men or women. Serum Lp levels are significantly higher in patients with carotid plaques or measurable intima-media thickness than in controls without. Despite these associations, there is no significant relationship between Lp level and arterial endothelial function, smooth muscle response, or carotid wall thickness, even though other lipid risk factors like low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and LDL-C/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio are correlated with abnormal arterial function and structure. There is new evidence that the association of Lp with extracellular matrix (ECM) secreted by arterial smooth muscle cells increases two- to threefold the subsequent specific binding of LDL. Alpha-defensins released from activated or senescent neutrophils stimulate the binding of Lp to ECM of endothelial cells. Several factors that affect the accumulation of Lp and oxidized LDL in the arterial intima have been identified. Several recent studies have provided new insights into the physiologic role that Lp might play in compromising fibrinolysis. The interaction of Lp with cells is clearly distinct from that with ECM and with fibrinogen; the regulation sites within Lp and plasminogen for these regulatory molecules are not identical. These recent advances bring us significantly closer to understanding how Lp exerts its atherogenic and thrombogenic properties.

Indexed as

ArteriosclerosisBiomarkersHumansLipoprotein(a)Risk FactorsBiomarkersLipoprotein(a)

Identifiers

PMID11122750
OpenAlexW1983113849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.