Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11122726›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2000

Niacin dosing: relationship to benefits and adverse effects.

D M Capuzzi, J M Morgan, O A Brusco, C M Intenzo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Ocular Effects of Niacin: A Review of the Literature.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2015
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Cystoid macular edema induced by low doses of nicotinic Acid.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D M CapuzziCardiovascular Disease Prevention Center, 211 S. 9th Street, Walnut Towers Suite 602, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. david.capuzzi@mail.tju.edu.
J M Morgan
O A Brusco
C M Intenzo
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the original observation by Altschul et al., that nicotinic acid (niacin), not nicotinamide, in pharmacologic doses lowered human serum cholesterol levels, an avalanche of reports have been published over the past 45 years on the plasma lipid-regulating properties of this drug and its beneficial cardiovascular effects. A myriad of studies that have examined efficacy, safety, adverse effects, and pharmacologic properties of niacin rendered convincing evidence that niacin, used alone or combined with other agents, has favorable effects on serum lipoprotein regulation and on containment of atherothrombotic cardiovascular diseases. However, because of the unusual side effect profile of niacin and the availability of various formulations of this drug, niacin must be used prudently and with careful instruction and monitoring of patients. This review summarizes the pertinent and recent literature on niacin that impacts its therapeutic use. We also discuss some controversial issues and personal clinical experience and opinions on this topic.

Indexed as

Anticholesteremic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansHypercholesterolemiaLipid MetabolismNiacinAnticholesteremic AgentsNiacin

Identifiers

PMID11122726
OpenAlexW1984146279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.