Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11121489›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2000

Comparison of the Escherichia coli K-12 genome with sampled genomes of a Klebsiella pneumoniae and three salmonella enterica serovars, Typhimurium, Typhi and Paratyphi.

M McClelland, L Florea, K Sanderson, S W Clifton, J Parkhill, C Churcher, G Dougan, R K Wilson, W Miller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic Characterization of AmpC and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Phenotypes inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interplay between tolerance mechanisms to copper and acid stress inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Translesion DNA Synthesis.EcoSal Plus · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M McClellandSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, 10835 Altman Row, San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
L Florea
K Sanderson
S W Clifton
J Parkhill
C Churcher
G Dougan
R K Wilson
W Miller
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center · US

Funding

DETAILED RESTRICTION MAP--SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM GENOMER01AI034829 · NIAID · SIDNEY KIMMEL CANCER CENTER · PI MCCLELLAND, MICHAEL · 1993 to 2006
$1.9M
SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING BIOSEQUENCE DATAR01LM005110 · NLM · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI MILLER, WEBB COLBY · 1989 to 1999
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI 34829-09NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034829NLM NIH HHS LM05110Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Escherichia coli K-12 genome (ECO) was compared with the sampled genomes of the sibling species Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Typhi and Paratyphi A (collectively referred to as SAL) and the genome of the close outgroup Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN). There are at least 160 locations where sequences of >400 bp are absent from ECO but present in the genomes of all three SAL and 394 locations where sequences are present in ECO but close homologs are absent in all SAL genomes. The 394 sequences in ECO that do not occur in SAL contain 1350 (30.6%) of the 4405 ECO genes. Of these, 1165 are missing from both SAL and KPN. Most of the 1165 genes are concentrated within 28 regions of 10-40 kb, which consist almost exclusively of such genes. Among these regions were six that included previously identified cryptic phage. A hypothetical ancestral state of genomic regions that differ between ECO and SAL can be inferred in some cases by reference to the genome structure in KPN and the more distant relative Yersinia pestis. However, many changes between ECO and SAL are concentrated in regions where all four genera have a different structure. The rate of gene insertion and deletion is sufficiently high in these regions that the ancestral state of the ECO/SAL lineage cannot be inferred from the present data. The sequencing of other closely related genomes, such as S.bongori or Citrobacter, may help in this regard.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialDatabases as TopicEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialKlebsiella pneumoniaeMultigene FamilyMutagenesis, InsertionalSalmonella entericaSequence AlignmentSequence DeletionSequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID11121489
PMCPMC115240
OpenAlexW2123939922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.