ArticleNucleic acids research2000
Differential requirements for cis and trans V(D)J cleavage: effects of substrate length.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA bending in the synaptic complex in V(D)J recombination: turning an ancestral transpososome upside down.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania) · 2014Review
- Complex oncogenic translocations with gene amplification are initiated by specific DNA breaks in lymphocytes.Cancer research · 2009Article
- Full-length RAG1 promotes contact with coding and intersignal sequences in RAG protein complexes bound to recombination signals paired in cis.Nucleic acids research · 2009Article
- Understanding how the V(D)J recombinase catalyzes transesterification: distinctions between DNA cleavage and transposition.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The assembly of productive synaptic complexes is a critical, but poorly understood, regulatory step in V(D)J recombination. Several lines of evidence suggest that there may be important differences between recombination involving sites situated in cis (on the same DNA molecule) and in trans (on separate molecules). Because biochemical experiments using both purified RAG proteins and crude extracts have failed to detect trans cleavage of plasmid substrates it has been thought that there is a substantial bias against trans synapsis. In conflict with these results are more recent studies showing that purified RAG proteins can catalyze trans cleavage of short oligonucleotide substrates. Furthermore, recent experiments have detected efficient trans cleavage of plasmid substrates in vivo. We sought to investigate why these different systems yield such divergent results. We found that, unexpectedly, the ability of both purified RAG proteins and crude extracts to cleave DNA substrates in trans is a function of substrate length. Our data raise two critical issues: first, oligonucleotides, which are the most commonly used substrates to study V(D)J recombination in vitro, do not mimic the behavior of plasmid substrates; second, in the trans cleavage reaction current purified RAG systems do not accurately reflect the in vivo situation. We propose a unifying model to explain the effects of substrate length and coniguration (cis or trans) on the efficiency of synapsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.