ArticleThe Journal of physiology2000
Regulation of the sensitivity of acetylcholine receptors to nicotine in rat habenula neurons.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurobiological Mechanisms of Nicotine Reward and Aversion.Pharmacological reviews · 2022Review
- Evaluation of Ca2+ permeability of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in hypothalamic histaminergic neurons.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2010Article
- Interactions of atropine with heterologously expressed and native alpha 3 subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Time-dependent changes in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) function were studied in acutely isolated medial habenula neurons during whole-cell perfusion. The peak amplitude of inward currents induced by 1 s pulses of nicotinic agonists, applied at 30 s intervals, gradually increased over the first several minutes of whole-cell recording. The ratio of response amplitudes at 1 and 15 min (t15/t1) was 1.9. Run-up of responses occurred independently of channel activation and was specific to nAChRs. The channel blocker chlorisondamine (30 microM), co-applied with nicotine, was used to irreversibly block the majority (91 %) of the nAChRs that opened in the first 2 min of recording. Run-up in the remaining 9 % unblocked channels assessed at 15 min (t15/t2 = 3.4) was similar to that in control cells not exposed to nicotine and chlorisondamine simultaneously, implying that run-up is not due to the incorporation of new receptors. A marked alteration in the sensitivity of nAChRs to extracellular Ca2+ was also observed during whole-cell perfusion. The ratio of current amplitudes obtained in 0.2 and 4.0 mM Ca2+ changed from 0.54 (t = 5 min) to 0.82 (t = 30 min). Inward rectification of nicotine-induced responses was reduced during internal dialysis. Voltages for half-maximal conductance were -23.0 and -13.8 mV at 2 and 15 min, respectively. Inclusion of either free Mg2+ ( approximately 2 mM) or spermine (100 microM) in the internal solution counteracted the change in rectification, but did not prevent run-up. The period of run-up was followed by a use-dependent run-down phase. Little run-down in peak current amplitude was induced provided that agonist was applied infrequently (5 min intervals), whereas applications at 30 s intervals produced a loss of channel function after approximately 15 min whole-cell perfusion. The time at which run-down began ( approximately 5-30 min) was correlated with the initial rate of nAChR desensitization ( approximately 200-4000 ms); slowly desensitizing nicotinic currents demonstrated delayed run-down. We suggest that run-up of nAChR-mediated responses does not require receptor activation and may result from a change in channel open probability. We also hypothesize that channel run-down reflects accumulation of nAChRs in long-lived desensitized/inactivated states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.