Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11118198›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2000

Evolutionary dynamics of full genome content in Escherichia coli.

H Ochman, I B Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Molecular insights into the genome dynamics and interactions between core and acquired genomes ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Vaginal microbiome: rethinking health and disease.Annual review of microbiology · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H OchmanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. hochman@email.arizona.edu
I B Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionary history of the entire Escherichia coli chromosome was traced by examining the distribution of the approximately 4300 open reading frames (ORFs) from E.coli MG1655 among strains of known genealogical relationships. Using this framework to deduce the incidence of gene transfer and gene loss, a total of 67 events-37 additions and 30 deletions-were required to account for the distribution of all genes now present in the MG1655 chromosome. Nearly 90% of the ORFs were common to all strains examined, but, given the variation in gene content and chromosome size, strains can contain well over a megabase of unique DNA, conferring traits that distinguish them from other members of the species. Moreover, strains vary widely in their frequencies of deletions, which probably accounts for the variation in genome size within the species.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialGenome, BacterialPhylogenyEscherichia coliGene DeletionOpen Reading FramesSalmonellaTransformation, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID11118198
PMCPMC305890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.