ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000
An integrated national pharmaceutical policy for the United Kingdom?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a national pharmaceutical research strategy in Lebanon: opportunities to bridge the gaps and reach the goals.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022Article
- National medicines policies - a review of the evolution and development processes.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2013Review
- An Australian perspective.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2012Article
- The concept of essential medicines: lessons for rich countries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Review
- Public drug procurement: the lessons from a drug tender in a teaching hospital of a transition country.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2004Article
- European healthcare policies for controlling drug expenditure.PharmacoEconomics · 2003Article
- From guidance to practice: Why NICE is not enough.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.