Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11115878›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2000

Arabidopsis species hybrids in the study of species differences and evolution of amphiploidy in plants.

M E Nasrallah, K Yogeeswaran, S Snyder, J B Nasrallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genetic enhancement of okra [Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Genetic and environmental manipulation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. African genomes illuminate the early history and transition to selfing inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Petunia, Your Next Supermodel?Frontiers in plant science · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M E NasrallahDepartment of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. men4@cornell.edu
K Yogeeswaran
S Snyder
J B Nasrallah

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that 5 million years of evolution separate Arabidopsis thaliana from its close relative Arabidopsis lyrata. The two taxa differ by many characteristics, and together they exemplify the differentiation of angiosperms into self-fertilizing and cross-fertilizing species as well as annual and perennial species. Despite their disparate life histories, the two species can be crossed to produce viable and vigorous hybrids exhibiting heterotic effects. Although pollen sterile, the hybrids produce viable ovules and were used as female parent in backcrosses to both parental species. The resulting backcross plants exhibited transgressive variation for a number of interesting developmental and growth traits as well as negative nuclear/cytoplasmic interactions. Moreover, the genesis of a fertile amphidiploid neospecies, apparently by spontaneous somatic doubling in an interspecific hybrid, was observed in the laboratory. The mechanisms responsible for the generation of amphiploids and the subsequent evolution of amphiploid genomes can now be studied through direct observation using the large arsenal of molecular tools available for Arabidopsis.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPloidiesArabidopsisChromosome SegregationCrosses, GeneticGenetic VariationHybridization, GeneticHybrid VigorSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID11115878
PMCPMC59859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.