Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11115821›Full record

ArticleGut2001

Colonic crypt cell proliferation state assessed by whole crypt microdissection in sporadic neoplasia and familial adenomatous polyposis.

S J Mills, J C Mathers, P D Chapman, J Burn, A Gunn

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gut, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of vitamin d and calcium on proliferation and differentiation in normal colon mucosa: a randomized clinical trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2009
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dietary Methyl Donor Depletion Suppresses Intestinal Adenoma Development.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A nomenclature for intestinal in vitro cultures.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2012
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S J MillsHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Department of Biological and Nutritional Sciences, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
J C Mathers
P D Chapman
J Burn
A Gunn
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has yet to be established whether proliferative activity in the macroscopically normal colonic mucosa is causally correlated with neoplastic risk. Measurement of proliferative activity in human subjects is of necessity usually undertaken using indirect methods with inherent limitations, and relatively little has been published on the effect of normal biological variables on such indices.

aimsTo establish the validity of mitosis counts following whole crypt microdissection as an index of the crypt cell proliferative state (CCPS) and to examine the effect of normal biological variables (age, sex, and colonic site) and colonic neoplasia on the mitotic index in macroscopically normal human colon. SUBJECTS: Mucosal samples were obtained at colectomy or colonoscopy from 107 individuals (24 controls, 23 sporadic adenoma patients, 31 sporadic carcinoma patients, and 29 patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)).

methodsMucosal specimens were hydrated, hydrolysed, and small groups of crypts separated from the main specimen under a dissecting microscope. The total number of mitoses/crypt were counted by one observer for each of 10 complete crypts.

resultsValidation work established that whole crypt mitoses counts were reliable and reproducible. There was no relation between age and mean mitoses/crypt (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.1). The CCPS count was higher for males than for females (difference in means 2.8 (95% confidence interval 0.80-4.66)) among controls but there was no gender difference in the three disease groups. For all disease groups and controls, the crypt mitotic count showed a significant linear increase (p=0.004) from the rectum to the caecum. Biopsies from within 5 cm of the macroscopic margin of a carcinoma (near) gave a mean mitosis count of 12.6 while those from more than 10 cm (far) were lower but not significantly so (p=0.12) with a count of 9.0. The mean mitoses/crypt were similar for the controls and adenomas (5.6 and 4.7, respectively) but greater for the cancers and especially for FAP (8.3 and 14.2, respectively). Statistical analysis confirmed that there were significant differences (p<0.05) between controls and all disease groups together, between sporadic disease and FAP, and between adenoma and carcinoma subjects at each of the four colonic sites. Post hoc comparison by t test showed significantly greater CCPS for FAP compared with controls (p<0.001) and for sporadic cancer versus controls (p=0.04).

conclusionsWhole crypt microdissection and mitosis counting is a reliable, reproducible, and robust technique for assessing CCPS in the human colon. CCPS is unaffected by age but increases from the distal to the proximal colon. CCPS is increased if a sporadic cancer is present and markedly increased in FAP. However, the precise relation of an increased CCPS to the neoplastic process remains uncertain.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceCarcinomaCase-Control StudiesColonColonic NeoplasmsDissectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitotic IndexRectum

Identifiers

PMID11115821
PMCPMC1728170
OpenAlexW2093746941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.