Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11115377›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2001

Mutation analysis of the entire PKD1 gene: genetic and diagnostic implications.

S Rossetti, L Strmecki, V Gamble, S Burton, V Sneddon, B Peral, S Roy, A Bakkaloglu, R Komel, C G Winearls and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 226 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic Assemblies in Genome Maintenance.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-Read Sequencing Identified aHuman mutation · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Targeted broad-based genetic testing by next-generation sequencing informs diagnosis and facilitates management in patients with kidney diseases.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

S RossettiDivision of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
L Strmecki
V Gamble
S Burton
V Sneddon
B Peral
S Roy
A Bakkaloglu
R Komel
C G Winearls
P C Harris
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBHacettepe University · TRInstitute of Child Health · INInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Sols-Morreale · ESLjubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation screening of the major autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) locus, PKD1, has proved difficult because of the large transcript and complex reiterated gene region. We have developed methods, employing long polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and specific reverse transcription-PCR, to amplify all of the PKD1 coding area. The gene was screened for mutations in 131 unrelated patients with ADPKD, using the protein-truncation test and direct sequencing. Mutations were identified in 57 families, and, including 24 previously characterized changes from this cohort, a detection rate of 52.3% was achieved in 155 families. Mutations were found in all areas of the gene, from exons 1 to 46, with no clear hotspot identified. There was no significant difference in mutation frequency between the single-copy and duplicated areas, but mutations were more than twice as frequent in the 3' half of the gene, compared with the 5' half. The majority of changes were predicted to truncate the protein through nonsense mutations (32%), insertions or deletions (29.6%), or splicing changes (6.2%), although the figures were biased by the methods employed, and, in sequenced areas, approximately 50% of all mutations were missense or in-frame. Studies elsewhere have suggested that gene conversion may be a significant cause of mutation at PKD1, but only 3 of 69 different mutations matched PKD1-like HG sequence. A relatively high rate of new PKD1 mutation was calculated, 1.8x10-5 mutations per generation, consistent with the many different mutations identified (69 in 81 pedigrees) and suggesting significant selection against mutant alleles. The mutation detection rate, in this study, of >50% is comparable to that achieved for other large multiexon genes and shows the feasibility of genetic diagnosis in this disorder.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAllelesAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceCohort StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA PrimersDNA Restriction EnzymesFemaleGenetic LinkageHeteroduplex AnalysisHumansMaleMutationPedigreePolycystic Kidney, Autosomal DominantDNA PrimersDNA Restriction EnzymesProteinsProtein Sorting SignalsTRPP Cation Channels

Identifiers

PMID11115377
PMCPMC1234934
OpenAlexW2099346627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.