Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11114748›Full record

ReviewOncogene2000

Tyrosine kinases and gastric cancer.

W Lin, H W Kao, D Robinson, H J Kung, C W Wu, H C Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Repurposing of gastric cancer drugs against COVID-19.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Gastric cancer biomarkers; A systems biology approach.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2018
    Article
  10. Gastric Cancer Genomics: Advances and Future Directions.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gene mutations in gastric cancer: a review of recent next-generation sequencing studies.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

W LinInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan, Republic of China.
H W Kao
D Robinson
H J Kung
C W Wu
H C Chen
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWUniversity of California, Davis · USNational Health Research Institutes · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carcinoma of the stomach is one of the most prevalent cancer types in the world today. Two major forms of gastric cancer are distinguished according to their morphological and clinicopathological classifications (well differentiated/intestinal type and poorly differentiated/diffuse type), characteristics that could also be attributed to the altered expression of different types of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. Significant differences exist for gastric cancer incidence comparing people of different ethnic origins, implicating various genetic and epigenetic factors for gastric oncogenesis. There are only a limited number of molecular markers available for gastric cancer detection and prognostic evaluation, among which are tyrosine kinases. There is convincing evidence that tyrosine kinases are involved in oncogenesis and disease progression for many human cancers. Amplifications of certain tyrosine kinases (c-met, k-sam and erbB2/neu) have been associated with human gastric cancer progression. Alternatively spliced transcripts and enhanced protein-expression levels for some of these tyrosine kinases are correlated with clinical outcomes for gastric cancer patients. With advent of high throughput techniques, it is now possible to detect nearly all expressed tyrosine kinases in a single screen. This increases the chance to identify additional tyrosine kinases as predictive markers for gastric cancers. In this article, we will first review the literature data concerning certain tyrosine kinases implicated in gastric carcinogenesis and then summarize more recent work which provide comprehensive tyrosine kinase profiles for gastric cancer specimens and cell lines. Two new gastric cancer molecular markers (tie-1 and mkk4) have been identified through the use of these profiles and demonstrated effective as clinical prognostic indicators.

Indexed as

HumansProtein-Tyrosine KinasesStomach NeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID11114748
OpenAlexW1992185689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.