ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000
Quality improvement reports: a new kind of article. They should allow authors to describe improvement projects so others can learn.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Publication and related biases in health services research: a systematic review of empirical evidence.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Pooled it
- Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Trial
- Ethical issues in using data from quality management programs.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2009Review
- QIR and SQUIRE: continuum of reporting guidelines for scholarly reports in healthcare improvement.Quality & safety in health care · 2008Article
- Lessons from the evaluation of the UK's NHS R&D implementation methods programme.Implementation science : IS · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.