ArticleFolia microbiologica1999
Direct PCR assay for detection of Neisseria meningitidis in human cerebrospinal fluid.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of 16S rDNA-PCR Amplification and Culture of Cerebrospinal Fluid for Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis.Iranian journal of pediatrics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A PCR amplification was performed to detect Neisseria meningitidis insertion sequence 1106 (IS-1106) in the human CerebroSpinal Fluid (CSF) in cases of meningitis. The study included 27 CSF samples from suspected meningitis patients. Although the inflammatory response in most of the samples was slightly increased, the results showed that 7 (26%) and 8 (30%) CSF samples were diagnosed as meningococcal meningitis by Gram staining and by culture, respectively. The primers of the IS-1106 were used for direct diagnosis of N. meningitidis in the human spinal fluid after a minor treatment of the CSF samples. The sample was diagnosed as meningococcal meningitis, if a DNA band of about 600 bp was detected in the ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel. The 27 CSF samples were analyzed in a random manner. Of these, 18 samples including the Gram staining- and culture-positive samples were also positive in PCR amplification. However, a CSF sample, which was diagnosed to be meningococcal meningitis in culture was negative in both Gram staining and PCR analysis. The specificity of the IS-1106 primers was determined to be 95%, with 100% sensitivity in comparison to Gram staining and culture. The primers were sensitive to 10 pg or more of meningococcal DNA. In addition, the PCR amplification showed high predictive values (89 and 100%) in diagnosing meningitis in patients that were negative and positive responders when tested by culture and by Gram staining. In conclusion, the PCR amplification of IS-1106 of N. meningitidis is specific and sensitive to both culture-positive and -negative meningococcal meningitis. Hence, PCR assay is highly recommended for use in a rapid diagnosis of suspected meningitis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.