ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2000
Guillain-Barré Syndrome.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Approach Towards Atypical Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Physiotherapy Perspective in a Case Report.Cureus · 2022Article
- Clinically and electrophysiologically diagnosed botulinum intoxication.BMJ case reports · 2013Article
- Inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies and neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathies: treatment update.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated polyneuropathy. Two thirds of GBS patients are unable to walk at their most severe state of disease. Respiratory insufficiency and autonomic failure are probably the main causes of death. Optimal general care, physiotherapy and the availability of intensive care facilities at short distance are of great importance. Randomized controlled trials show that intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PE) are equally effective in reducing the time to functional recovery. The combination of PE followed by IVIg, is not significantly better than IVIg or PE alone. Corticosteroids alone are not effective in GBS. Approximately 10% of GBS patients deteriorate after initial improvement or stabilization following IVIg or PE treatment, and often require repeated treatment. These "treatment related clinical fluctuations" are more frequently seen in relatively young patients with severe motor and sensory involvement associated with a preceding and possibly ongoing cytomegalovirus infection. Predominantly motor GBS is frequently preceded by a Campylobacter jejeuni infection. Diarrhea prior to GBS is associated with a worse predicted outcome. Further confirmation is needed to determine whether this is especially the case in those patients treated with PE. GBS patients who are unable to walk without assistance, and who are still within their first 2 weeks of the disease, need to be treated. One PE study showed that patients who are only mildly disabled showed positive progress from two plasma exchange sessions. Presently, due to its wide availability, ease of administration, and favorable side-effect profile, IVIg is considered to be the first-line treatment for patients with GBS. Current investigations are trying to determine if IVIg used in combination with methylprednisolone is even more effective in treating GBS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.