Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11096588›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2000

Acute Intestinal Pseudo-obstruction.

Quigley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

QuigleyClinical Sciences Building, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. equigley@ucc.ie
Cork University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute pseudo-obstruction may manifest clinically in one of three forms--acute gastroparesis, ileus, and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie's syndrome). Though formerly associated primarily with the postoperative state, these entities are increasingly recognized in association with a wide variety of major medical problems. There are few controlled studies to guide the clinician in the management of these disorders. Treatment remains largely empirical, and time-honored, based primarily on "bowel rest," nasogastric decompression, and supportive care. While a wide variety of pharmacologic approaches have been advocated, few have been subjected to, or survived, the rigors of a properly controlled trial. Neostigmine is a notable exception, and has been shown to be effective in Ogilvie's syndrome. Perforation is a significant threat in megacolon; colonoscopic, or surgical decompression may, therefore, be indicated. Both are associated with significant risks in this context, but may prevent progression to perforation with its attendant mortality. New approaches seek to exploit current concepts in the pathophysiology of ileus and megacolon but have not, as yet, achieved efficacy in human studies.

Identifiers

PMID11096588
OpenAlexW2029677611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.