ReviewThe New England journal of medicine2000
Screening for lung cancer.
Review in The New England journal of medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
87 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Screening for lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Resectable lung lesions malignancy assessment and cancer detection by ultra-deep sequencing of targeted gene mutations in plasma cell-free DNA.Journal of medical genetics · 2019Trial
- Concomitant screening of coronary artery disease and lung cancer with a new ultrafast-low-dose Computed Tomography protocol: A pilot randomised trial.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.JAMA internal medicine · 2014Trial
- CT scan screening for lung cancer: risk factors for nodules and malignancy in a high-risk urban cohort.PloS one · 2012Trial
- Exploring the uncertainties of early detection results: model-based interpretation of mayo lung project.BMC cancer · 2011Trial
- Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Manual Versus Powered Endoscopic Staplers in Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of lung cancer discovery mode on cancer outcomes: data from the KBP-2020-CPHG study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- ERS Congress 2025: highlights from the Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Assembly.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Observational Study on Actual Cancer Screening Participation and Outcomes Among Patients with Lung Cancer Based on Linkage of Cancer Registry and Kyoto City Integrated Database Data from 2014 to 2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Observational
- Screening for Lung Cancer, Overdiagnosis, and Healthcare Utilization: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2025Article
- The pros and cons of lung cancer screening.European radiology · 2025Review
- Similar overall survivals of wedge resection and segmentectomy in stage IA1 non-small cell lung cancer: a population-based study using propensity score matching and coarsened exact matching.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- How will lung cancer screening and lung nodule management change the diagnostic and surgical lung cancer landscape?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Review
- Challenge and future of cancer screening in China: Insights from esophageal cancer screening practice.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- Article
- Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer prevention: understanding the mechanisms of action is key.European journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Highly sensitive noninvasive early lung cancer detection using DNA methylation topology in sputum-derived epithelial cells.JTCVS open · 2023Article
- Lung cancer in the emergency department.Emergency cancer care · 2023Review
27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11096172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.