ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2000
Candiduria: When and How to Treat It.
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-intravenous Amphotericin B: A Review of Localized Administration Routes.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Catheter-Associated Candiduria: Aggregates, Microscopy, and CFU Variability.Mycopathologia · 2026Article
- CAUTIon - not all UTIs are the same.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Candiduria; a review article with specific data from Iran.Turkish journal of urology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical finding of candiduria is often an enigmatic problem for the evaluating physician. The significance of yeast in the urine can range from procurement contamination to a sign of a life-threatening, opportunistic fungal infection. Proper evaluation requires validation of funguria, consideration of the setting in which it occurs, and the status of the patient. Provided that the patient is clinically stable, asymptomatic candiduria usually need not be treated with an antifungal agent. Rather, management should be directed at the elimination of predisposing factors, if feasible. When treatment is required, appropriate agents include amphotericin B (AmB), various lipid preparations of AmB (L-AmB), azoles, and flucytosine. Parenteral AmB is most useful against life-threatening infections in which the urinary tract is but one component of a widespread infection, or when resistant Candida are causative. Shorter courses of therapy may be preferable in certain cases. L-AmB treatment has been less sucessful. Intravesical AmB is a time-honored approach, but is best employed diagnostically rather than therapeutically. Fluconazole is presently the agent of first choice for susceptible fungi, but dosage and duration of therapy have not been established. Flucytosine is a useful alternative, especially for resistant Candida, but its toxicity must be closely monitored.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.