Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11095884›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2000

Impact of Antimicrobial Resistance on the Treatment of Invasive Pneumococcal Infections.

Rocha, Baleeiro, Tunkel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

RochaDepartment of Medicine, MCP Hahnemann University, 3300 Henry Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA. allan.tunkel@ drexel.edu
Baleeiro
Tunkel
Hahnemann University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases, such as pneumococcal pneumonia, which were almost invariably lethal in the pre-antibiotic era, caused radically less mortality with the advent of antimicrobial chemotherapy. However, the use, misuse, and abuse of these agents have led to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. In the past, pneumococci were all exquisitely sensitive to penicillin G. By the late 1960s, penicillin-nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae (PNSP) was being described. Since then, this problem has achieved epidemic proportions in many areas of the world, including the United States. Many experts no longer consider penicillin an acceptable therapy for patients suspected of having invasive pneumococcal disease, especially if the central nervous system (CNS) is involved. Recommendations for therapy are based on theoretical concerns, in vitro susceptibility testing, animal data, and a few, scattered reports of penicillin failure in patients with invasive disease.

Identifiers

PMID11095884
OpenAlexW2064433544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.