Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11095715›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

A continuous assay for DNA cleavage: the application of "break lights" to enediynes, iron-dependent agents, and nucleases.

J B Biggins, J R Prudent, D J Marshall, M Ruppen, J S Thorson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genome mining for new enediyne antibiotics.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Fluorescent Probes of DNA Repair.ACS chemical biology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Selective fluorogenic chemosensors for distinct classes of nucleases.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J B BigginsLaboratory for Biosynthetic Chemistry, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the Sloan-Kettering Division, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
J R Prudent
D J Marshall
M Ruppen
J S Thorson
Cornell University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
STUDIES ON CALICHEAMICIN BIOSYNTHESIS AND SELF RESISTANCER01CA084374 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI THORSON, JON SCOTT · 2000 to 2013
$3.6M
MECHANISTIC STUDIES OF PROKARYOTIC MANNOSYLTRANSFERASESR01GM058196 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI THORSON, JON SCOTT · 1998 to 2002
$588k
NCI NIH HHS CA-08748NCI NIH HHS CA84374NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084374NIGMS NIH HHS GM58196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although extensive effort has been applied toward understanding the mechanism by which enediynes cleave DNA, a continuous assay for this phenomenon is still lacking. In fact, with the exception of assays for DNase, continuous assays for most DNA cleavage events are unavailable. This article describes the application of "molecular break lights" (a single-stranded oligonucleotide that adopts a stem-and-loop structure and carries a 5'-fluorescent moiety, a 3'-nonfluorescent quenching moiety, and an appropriate cleavage site within the stem) to develop the first continuous assay for cleavage of DNA by enediynes. Furthermore, the generality of this approach is demonstrated by using the described assay to directly compare the DNA cleavage by naturally occurring enediynes [calicheamicin and esperamicin), non-enediyne small molecule agents (bleomycin, methidiumpropyl-EDTA-Fe(II), and EDTA-Fe(II]), as well as the restriction endonuclease BamHI. Given the simplicity, speed, and sensitivity of this approach, the described methodology could easily be extended to a high throughput format and become a new method of choice in modern drug discovery to screen for novel protein-based or small molecule-derived DNA cleavage agents.

Indexed as

AminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBleomycinCatalysisDeoxyribonucleasesDNAEnediynesHydrolysisIronKineticsAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBleomycincalicheamicin epsilonDeoxyribonucleasesDNAEnediynesesperamicin A1Iron

Identifiers

PMID11095715
PMCPMC17611
OpenAlexW2169834878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.