Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11095696›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2000

Full flexibility genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms by the GOOD assay.

S Sauer, D Lechner, K Berlin, C Plançon, A Heuermann, H Lehrach, I G Gut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Technologies in the Whole-Genome Age: MALDI-TOF-Based Genotyping.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2009
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genotyping of single nucleotide substitutions.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2006
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular haplotyping at high throughput.Nucleic acids research · 2002
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Progress in high throughput SNP genotyping methods.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2002
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S SauerFreie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie, Takustrasse 3, 14195 Berlin-Dahlem, Germany.
D Lechner
K Berlin
C Plançon
A Heuermann
H Lehrach
I G Gut

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently a facile method for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using MALDI mass spectrometry, termed the GOOD assay, was developed. It does not require any purification and is performed with simple liquid handling, thermal incubation and cycling steps. Although this method is well suited to automation and high-throughput analysis of SNPs, it did not allow full flexibility due to lack of certain reagents. A complete set of ss-cyanoethyl phosphoramidites is presented herein that give this SNP genotyping method full sequence and multiplex capabilities. Applications to SNP genotyping in the prion protein gene, the ss-2-adrenergic receptor gene and the angiotensin converting enzyme gene using the GOOD assay are demonstrated. Because SNP genotyping technologies are generally very sensitive to varying DNA quality, the GOOD assay has been stabilised and optimised for low quality DNA. A template extraction method is introduced that allows genotyping from tissue that was taken while placing an ear tag on an animal. This dramatically facilitates the application of genotyping to animal agricultural applications, as it demonstrates that expensive and cumbersome DNA extraction procedures prior to genotyping can be avoided.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAnimalsCattleDNAGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationDNAReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2

Identifiers

PMID11095696
PMCPMC115184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.