ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)1996
Adenomyoepithelioma of the Breast: A Case Reprot and a Review of Literature.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 74-year-old woman complained of a small nodule in the outer lower quadrant of her left breast. On physical examination, a 0.9 x 0.8 cm, round-shaped and firmly elastic nodule was palpated. Excisional biopsy was performed. Histologically, the tumor was separated into, with a bicellular pattern, containing both numerous glandular structures and numerous spindle-shaped cells. Immunohistochemical staining for EMA and cytokeratin showed strongly positive immunoreactivity for epithelial cells. Staining for &aipha;-SMA showed strongly positive immunoreactivity for myoepithelial components. Staining for keratin and S-100 protein showed weakly positive immunoreactivity for myoepithelial cells. Microscopically, the tumor was diagnosed as adenomyoepithelioma of the breast. Immunohistochemical examination is needed to distinguish epithelial cell proliferation from myoepithelial cell proliferation. Immunohistochemical examination using antibodies against EMA, alpha-SMA, Keratin, cytokeratin and S-100 protein, is indispensable.
Identifiers
11091556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.