Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11091527›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)1995

Breast Cancer: A Revolutionary Concept.

Baum, Colletta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. New hypothesis on the origin of metastases.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

BaumSurgery, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
Colletta
Royal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we trace the evolution of paradigms concerning the nature of breast cancer and their therapeutic consequences. There is no doubt that the conceptual revolution of about 20 years ago has led to modest gains in survival following the use of adjuvant systemic therapy and the quality of survival by demonstrating the safety of conservative surgical regimens. At the same time, there seems to be a plateau in progress. The results of adjuvant systemic therapy are not as good as anticipated and there are a number of other inconsistencies within the conventional model of biological predeterminism that remain to be explained. We offer up an alternative paradigm that suggests that not all metastases are due to cellular dissemination with late onset local and distant recurrence resulting from a transfection phenomenon, whereby subcellular particles shed by the primary cancer cell are taken up by wandering cells of the monocyte macrophage system and transported to distant sites where the local mesenchymal cells are transfected with the genetic information that activates components of the genome to instruct these plastic cells to express the phenotypic picture of a dedifferentiated breast duct epithelial cell. Such a conceptual revolution will open up the way for a new program of research and the development of therapies based on anti-viral rather than cytotoxic drugs.

Identifiers

PMID11091527
OpenAlexW2021468105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.