Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11090516›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: evidence from a national cross sectional survey.

P Primatesta, N R Poulter

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid-lowering medication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions to improve adherence to lipid lowering medication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Dyslipidemia in Chongqing, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Primary non-adherence in Portugal: findings and implications.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P PrimatestaDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London WC1E 6BT. paolap@publichealth.ucla.ac.uk
N R Poulter
Imperial College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of the use of lipid lowering agents and its relation to blood lipid concentrations in English adults.

designCross sectional survey.

settingEngland, 1998.

participantsNationally representative sample of 13 586 adults (aged >/=16 years) living in non-institutional households.

main outcome measuresMean blood concentrations of total cholesterol and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol, in participants classified by age and sex; prevalence of raised total cholesterol concentrations and increased ratio of total to HDL cholesterol; prevalence of use of lipid lowering agents and the lipid concentrations of people taking them.

resultsMean total cholesterol concentrations were 5.47 (SE 0. 02) mmol/l in men and 5.59 (0.02) mmol/l in women. Mean HDL cholesterol concentrations were 1.28 (0.01) mmol/l in men and 1.55 (0.01) mmol/l in women. Overall, of 10 569 adults who had a valid cholesterol measurement taken 7133 (67.5%; 95% confidence interval 66.5% to 68.4%) had a total cholesterol concentration >/=5 mmol/l, 2804 (26.5%; 25.7% to 27.4%) had a ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol >/=5 mmol/l, and 237 (2.2%; 1.9% to 2.5%) reported taking lipid lowering drugs. Of 117 participants with no history of cardiovascular disease but whose estimated 10 year risk of coronary heart disease was >/=30% and whose total cholesterol concentration was >/=5 mmol/l, four (3%) were taking lipid lowering drugs. Of 385 adults aged 16-75 with a history of coronary heart disease and eligible for lipid lowering treatment, 114 (30%; 25% to 34%) were taking lipid lowering drugs, of whom only 50 (44%; 35% to 53%) had a total cholesterol concentration <5 mmol/l.

conclusionsDespite the high prevalence of dyslipidaemia in English adults, the proportion of adults taking lipid lowering drugs in 1998 was only 2.2%. Rates of treatment were low among high risk patients eligible for primary prevention with lipid lowering drugs, and less than one third of patients with established cardiovascular disease received such treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCholesterol, HDLCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHealth SurveysHumansHypercholesterolemiaHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, HDLHypolipidemic AgentsLipids

Identifiers

PMID11090516
PMCPMC27537
OpenAlexW2010685853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.