Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11090498›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Accountability for reasonableness.

N Daniels

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 232 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patient, carer and family experiences of seeking redress and reconciliation following a life-changing event: Systematic review of qualitative evidence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Commercial determinants of health: an ethical exploration.International journal of public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Can health justice be measured? A normative reconstruction of health equity indicators.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Getting fairer over time? Assessing changes in health technology funding processes using the accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  16. Access to Cancer Medicines in Türkiye Through Legal Avenues: An Analysis from the Perspective of Medical Ethics.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

N Daniels

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth PrioritiesHumansSocial ResponsibilityState MedicineUnited KingdomHealth Care and Public HealthNational Health Service

Identifiers

PMID11090498
PMCPMC1119050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.