Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11089862›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2000

Regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana.

H Stals, P Casteels, M Van Montagu, D Inzé

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Plant D-type cyclins and the control of G1 progression.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2002
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A transcriptional roadmap to wood formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  15. Article
  16. APO2001: A sexy apomixer in como.The Plant cell · 2001
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H StalsDepartment Plantengenetic, Vlaams Interuniversitair Instituut voor Biotechniologie, Universiteit Gent, Belgium.
P Casteels
M Van Montagu
D Inzé
Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, different families of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and cyclins have been identified, indicating that also in plants the progression through the cell cycle is regulated by CDKs. In all eukaryotes, CDKs exert their activity through well-controlled phosphorylations of specific substrates on serine/threonine residues. Such post-translational modifications are universal mechanisms in signal transduction pathways. They allow the organism to differentiate, regulate growth and/or adapt to environmental changes, the latter being crucial for plants because of their sedentary life-style. This adaptation might explain the occurrence of a special CDK type with plant-specific features. This review focuses on the involvement of plant CDKs in different phases of the cell cycle in Arabidopsis thaliana and outlines their regulation by binding to other proteins, and by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantArabidopsisCell CycleCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclinsPhosphorylationCyclin-Dependent KinasesCyclins

Identifiers

PMID11089862
OpenAlexW1511423396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.