Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11083625›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

Monotherapy with intravenous followed by oral high-dose ciprofloxacin versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as initial empiric therapy for granulocytopenic patients with fever.

H Giamarellou, H P Bassaris, G Petrikkos, W Busch, M Voulgarelis, A Antoniadou, E Grouzi, N Zoumbos

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guidelines by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Blood stream infections during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: treatment cycle matters.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

H Giamarellou4th Department of Internal Medicine, Greece. hgiama@ath.forthnet.gr
H P Bassaris
G Petrikkos
W Busch
M Voulgarelis
A Antoniadou
E Grouzi
N Zoumbos
University of Patras · GRAthens State University · USBayer (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to obtain clinical experience with the use of high-dose ciprofloxacin as monotherapy for the treatment of febrile neutropenia episodes (granulocyte count, <500/mm(3)) compared to a standard regimen and to clarify whether ciprofloxacin administration may be switched to the oral route. In a prospective randomized study ciprofloxacin was given at 400 mg three times a day (t.i.d.) for at least 72 h followed by oral administration at 750 mg twice a day (b.i.d). That regimen was compared with ceftazidime given intravenously at 2 g t.i.d. plus amikacin given intravenously at 500 mg b.i.d. The frequency of successful clinical response without modification at the end of therapy was almost identical for ciprofloxacin (50% [62 of 124 patients]) compared with that for ceftazidime plus amikacin (50.8% [62 of 122 patients]) in an intent-to-treat analysis; the frequencies were 48.3% (57 of 118 patients) versus 49.6% (56 of 113 patients), respectively, in a per-protocol analysis (P values for one-sided equivalence, 0.0485 and 0.0516, respectively; delta = 10%), with no significant differences among patients with bacteremia and other microbiologically or clinically documented infections and fever of unknown origin. For 82 (66.1%) patients, it was possible to switch from parenteral ciprofloxacin to the oral ciprofloxacin, and the response was successful for 61 (74.4%) patients. The efficacies of the regimens against streptococcal bacteremias were 16.6% (one of six patients) for the ciprofloxacin group and 33.3% (one of three patients) for the combination group (it was not statistically significant), with one breakthrough streptococcal bacteremia observed among the ciprofloxacin-treated patients. Adverse events were mostly self-limited and were observed in 27 (20.6%) ciprofloxacin-treated patients and 26 (19.7%) patients who were receiving the combination. This study demonstrates that high-dose ciprofloxacin given intravenously for at least 3 days and then by the oral route is therapeutically equivalent to the routine regimen of intraveneous ceftazidime plus amikacin even in febrile patients with severe neutropenia (polymorphonuclear leukocyte count, <100 mm(3)). However, it is very important that before an empirical therapy is chosen each hospital determine bacteriologic predominance and perform resistance surveillance.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgranulocytosisAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCeftazidimeCephalosporinsCiprofloxacinDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFeverHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCeftazidimeCephalosporinsCiprofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID11083625
PMCPMC90190
OpenAlexW2162984346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.