Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11083491›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2000

Production of first generation adenovirus vectors: a review.

X Danthinne, M J Imperiale

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Four decades of adenovirus gene transfer vectors: History and current use.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Construction and application of adenoviral vectors.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Gene therapy duringFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

X DanthinneO.D. 260 Inc, Mountain States Medical Research Institute, and VA Medical Center, Boise, ID, USA.
M J Imperiale
Boise VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

RECOMBINANT ADENOVIRAL VECTORS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASR01HL064762 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI IMPERIALE, MICHAEL J · 1999 to 2003
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL64762NIGMS NIH HHS GM34902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, adenovirus vectors have generated tremendous interest, especially in gene therapy applications. In the so-called 'first generation' adenovirus vectors, the transgenes are inserted in place of the E1 region, or less often the E3 region. Although second-generation and helper-dependent adenovirus vectors will probably prevail in the future in applications that require long-term gene expression, first generation adenovirus vectors will remain very useful in other settings, such as cancer and vaccination, or simply to transfect cell lines that are refractory to other transfection methods. Until a few years ago, the construction of first generation adenovirus vectors was a labor-intensive and time-consuming process. More than 20 methods have appeared that facilitate their construction and are reviewed below.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesAdenoviridaeAnimalsGenetic TherapyHumansRecombination, GeneticTransfection

Identifiers

PMID11083491
OpenAlexW2093697903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.