Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11082130›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000

Role of EDHF in the vasodilatory effect of loop diuretics in guinea-pig mesenteric resistance arteries.

F Pourageaud, C Bappel-Gozalbes, R Marthan, J L Freslon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F PourageaudLaboratoire de Pharmacodynamie (INSERM E9937), Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Victor Segalen-Bordeaux 2, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.
C Bappel-Gozalbes
R Marthan
J L Freslon
Inserm · FRLaboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Relaxing effect of loop diuretics, piretanide and furosemide in comparison with acetylcholine (ACh) was investigated in guinea-pig isolated mesenteric resistance arteries. 2. Concentration-response curves to ACh (0.001 - 10 microM) and diuretics (0.0001 - 1 microM) were constructed in noradrenaline (10 - 30 microM)-precontracted arteries incubated either in normal physiological salt solution (PSS) or in 30 mM KCl PSS (K-PSS). 3. In PSS, maximal relaxations (R(max)) and pD(2) to ACh were 87+/-2% and 7.1+/-0.1 (n=10). L-N(G)-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 100 microM) reduced R(max) by 20% (P<0.01, n=7) and pD(2) by 10% (P<0.01). In contrast, indomethacin (10 microM) increased R(max) by 19% (P<0.01, n=8) and pD(2) by 10% (P<0.05). Combination of L-NAME+indomethacin reversed the effect observed with either of these inhibitors used alone. In K-PSS, R(max) was attenuated by 40% (P<0.001, n=6) compared to PSS. L-NAME reduced R(max) by 65% (P<0.01, n=5) and increased pD(2) by 15 fold. L-NAME+indomethacin suppressed the resistant relaxation. 4. In PSS+L-NAME+indomethacin, inhibitors of small (SK(Ca); apamin, 0.1 microM) and large (BK(Ca); iberiotoxin and charybdotoxin, 0.1 microM) conductance Ca(2+)-sensitive K(-)-channels used alone had little effect on the ACh-response. Combination of apamin+iberiotoxin reduced R(max) by 40% (P<0.05, n=7) while apamin+charybdotoxin fully abolished the resistant relaxation. 5. In PSS, piretanide and furosemide induced relaxation with R(max): 89+/-3% vs 84+/-5% and pD(2): 8.5+/-0.1 vs 7.7+/-0.2 (P<0.01) for piretanide (n=11) and furosemide (n=10), respectively. Endothelial abrasion suppressed relaxation to diuretics. L-NAME and indomethacin used alone or in combination did not significantly modify the response to diuretics. 6. In K-PSS, piretanide-induced relaxation was abolished whereas that to furosemide was reduced by 70% (P<0.001, n=9) compared to PSS and was suppressed by L-NAME+indomethacin. In PSS+L-NAME+indomethacin, apamin slightly reduced relaxation to diuretics whereas charybdotoxin or iberiotoxin abolished the response. 7. These results indicate that ACh-evoked relaxation is mediated by both NO/PGl(2)-dependent and -independent mechanisms. The EDHF-dependent component relies on activation of Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channels, is sensitive to a combination of apamin+charybdotoxin and to a smaller degree to a combination of apamin+iberiotoxin. Loop diuretic-induced relaxation is endothelium-dependent, appears to be mediated by NO, PGl(2) and EDHF for furosemide and EDHF only for piretanide. For the two diuretics, opening of BK(Ca) channels may be involved in the relaxation.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsBiological FactorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsDiureticsEndothelium, VascularEnzyme InhibitorsEpoprostenolFurosemideGuinea PigsIndomethacinMaleMesenteric ArteriesNG-Nitroarginine Methyl EsterNitric OxideSulfonamidesAcetylcholineBiological FactorsCyclooxygenase InhibitorsDiureticsendothelium-dependent hyperpolarization factorEnzyme InhibitorsEpoprostenolFurosemideIndomethacinNG-Nitroarginine Methyl EsterNitric OxidepiretanideSulfonamidesVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID11082130
PMCPMC1572446
OpenAlexW2053859080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.