ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000
Hyperpolarization-induced dilatation of submucosal arterioles in the guinea-pig ileum.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrical coupling and release of K+ from endothelial cells co-mediate ACh-induced smooth muscle hyperpolarization in guinea-pig inner ear artery.The Journal of physiology · 2005Article
- Junctional and nonjunctional effects of heptanol and glycyrrhetinic acid derivates in rat mesenteric small arteries.British journal of pharmacology · 2004Article
- Endothelium-dependent smooth muscle hyperpolarization: do gap junctions provide a unifying hypothesis?British journal of pharmacology · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The effects of inhibition of acetylcholine (ACh)-induced hyperpolarization on dilatation of submucosal arterioles were investigated in the guinea-pig ileum. 2. In smooth muscles of the arterioles depolarized by Ba(2+) (0.5 mM) to about -40 mV, ACh (3 microM) repolarized the membrane to about -65 mV (hyperpolarization), irrespective of the absence or presence of L-N(omega)-nitroarginine (L-NOARG, 0.1 mM) and diclofenac (1 microM), and increased the diameter (dilatation). 3. Combined application of charybdotoxin (CTX, 50 nM) and apamin (0.1 microM), inhibitors of some types of K(+)-channels, abolished the ACh-induced hyperpolarization and dilatation. 4. 18 beta-Glycerrhetinic acid (18 beta-GA, 30 microM), a known inhibitor of gap junctions, depolarized the membrane to about -36 mV, either in the absence or in the presence of Ba(2+), with no associated contraction of the arterioles. In the presence of 18 beta-GA, ACh-induced hyperpolarization was abolished, however the dilatation was inhibited only partially, with associated inhibition of constriction produced by Ba(2+) and NA. 5. 18 beta-GA inhibited the dilatation produced by sodium nitroprusside, an NO donor. 6. The ACh-induced hyperpolarization and dilatation were abolished in the presence of 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (30 microM), an inhibitory modulator of inositol trisphosphate receptor-mediated Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores. 7. It is concluded that in submucosal arterioles, hyperpolarizations produced by ACh have causal relationship to the arteriolar dilatation. 18 beta-GA did not induce parallel relationship between hyperpolarization and dilatation produced by ACh. 18 beta-GA may have unidentified inhibitory effects on agonist-mediated actions, in addition to the inhibition of gap junctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.