Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11082112›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000

Effects of mibefradil and nifedipine on arteriolar myogenic responsiveness and intracellular Ca(2+).

S J Potocnik, T V Murphy, N Kotecha, M A Hill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oxidative Regulation of Vascular CaAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  2. Acid-base regulation and sensing: Accelerators and brakes in metabolic regulation of cerebrovascular tone.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018
    Review
  3. T-type CaChannels (Austin, Tex.) · 2017
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Conducted dilatation to ATP and KActa physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanical control of cation channels in the myogenic response.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S J PotocnikMicrovascular Biology Group, Department of Human Biology and Movement Science, RMIT University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
T V Murphy
N Kotecha
M A Hill
RMIT University · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. Ca(2+) entry mechanisms underlying spontaneous arteriolar tone and acute myogenic reactivity remain uncertain. These studies aimed to compare the effects of nifedipine and the putative T-channel blocker, mibefradil, on arteriolar myogenic responsiveness and intracellular Ca(2+) (Ca(2+)(i)). 2. First order cremaster muscle arterioles (1A) were isolated from rats, cannulated, pressurized to 70 mmHg in the absence of intraluminal flow, and mechanical responses studied by video microscopy. The Ca(2+)(i) was measured using fluorescence imaging of Fura 2 loaded arterioles. 3. Both nifedipine and mibefradil showed dose-dependent inhibition of spontaneous myogenic tone (at 70 mmHg; pEC(50) 7.04+/-0.17 vs 6.65+/-0.20 respectively, n=6 for both, n.s.) and KCl-induced vasoconstriction (at 70 mmHg; pEC(50) 6.93+/-0. 38 vs 6.45+/-0.27 respectively, n=6 for both, n.s.). 4. In arterioles maintained at 50 mmHg, nifedipine (10(-7) and 10(-5) M) caused a concentration dependent reduction in Ca(2+)(i), however, mibefradil (10(-7) and 10(-5) M) had no effect. Furthermore nifedipine significantly attenuated the increase in Ca(2+)(i) associated with an acute pressure step (50 - 120 mmHg) whereas mibefradil was considerably less effective. 5. Mibefradil (10(-7) M) significantly attenuated contractile responses to 60 mM KCl without altering the KCl-induced increase in Ca(2+)(i), in contrast to nifedipine (10(-7) M) which reduced both Ca(2+)(i) and contraction. 6. Membrane potential of arterioles with spontaneous myogenic tone (70 mmHg) was -41.5+/-1. 0 mV. Nifedipine (10(-7) or 10(-5) M) had no effect on membrane potential, however mibefradil (10(-5) M) caused significant depolarization. 7. In summary, both mibefradil and nifedipine inhibit arteriolar spontaneous tone and acute myogenic reactivity. While there may be overlap in the mechanisms by which these agents inhibit tone, differences in effects on membrane potential and intracellular Ca(2+) levels suggest mibefradil exhibits actions other than blockade of Ca(2+) entry in skeletal muscle arterioles.

Indexed as

AnimalsArteriolesCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersMaleMembrane PotentialsMibefradilMuscle, Smooth, VascularMuscle TonusNifedipinePotassiumRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCalciumCalcium Channel BlockersMibefradilNifedipinePotassium

Identifiers

PMID11082112
PMCPMC1572423
OpenAlexW2048844546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.