ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2000
Lack of involvement of endothelin-1 in angiotensin II-induced contraction of the isolated rat tail artery.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reduction of blood pressure by store-operated calcium channel blockers.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2015Article
- Regulation of blood pressure and salt homeostasis by endothelin.Physiological reviews · 2011Review
- Lack of involvement of endothelin-1 in angiotensin II-induced contraction of the isolated rat tail artery.British journal of pharmacology · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. The contribution of endothelin-1 (ET-1) to angiotensin II (Ang II)-mediated contraction of the isolated rat tail artery was assessed with measurements of tension, and cytosolic calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)). The distribution of the AT(1) receptor was studied with RT - PCR and immunohistochemistry. 2. Ang II induced an endothelium-independent contraction (pEC(50) 7.95+/-0.06 and E(max): 0.46 g+/-0.05 with endothelium vs 7.81+/-0.02 and 0.41 g+/-0.07 without endothelium; P>0.05). Ang II (0.003 - 0.3 microM)-induced a non-sustained contraction of endothelium-intact preparations which was not antagonized by BQ-123 (1 microM), but was inhibited by losartan (10 nM). In addition, the maximal contraction induced by ET-1 (0.1 microM) could be further increased by the addition of 0.1 microM Ang II. 3. Ang II (0.001 - 0.3 microM) elevated [Ca(2+)](i) in single vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in a dose-dependent manner (pEC(50) 9.12+/-0.26) and the Ang II-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](i) were not affected by a Ca(2+)-free solution, but were abolished by pretreatment with caffeine (5 mM). Ang II did not increase [Ca(2+)](i) in endothelial cells. ET-1 (0.1 microM) increased [Ca(2+)](i) in single VSMCs in a normal Ca(2+) containing physiological saline solution (PSS), but not in a Ca(2+)-free solution. 4. Ang II-induced contraction was insensitive to inhibition by nifedipine (0.1 microM), an antagonist of L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels, and SK&F96365 (10 microM), which blocks non-selective cation channels, whereas that to ET-1 was inhibited by SK&F69365. 5. RT - PCR data indicate the expression of AT(1A) and AT(1B) on both VSMCs and endothelial cells, but immunohistochemical evidence illustrates that the AT(1) is located primarily on VSMCs. 6. These results indicate that endothelium-derived ET-1 is not involved in the Ang II-mediated vasoconstriction of the rat tail artery and that Ang II- and ET-1-mediated VSM contractions utilize distinct pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.