Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11080003›Full record

ArticleProceedings. AMIA Symposium2000

ActiveGuidelines: integrating Web-based guidelines with computer-based patient records.

P C Tang, C Y Young

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MULTIPROFESSIONAL ELECTRONIC PROTOCOL FOR DIGESTIVE SURGERY VALIDATION.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2021
    Article
  3. A distributed, collaborative, structuring model for a clinical-guideline digital-library.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2003
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P C TangEpic Research Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA.
C Y Young

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of the World Wide Web provides an efficient means to disseminate guidelines, but integrating them into the workflow at the point of care remains elusive. We developed a method, ActiveGuidelines (AGL), of integrating web-based guidelines with computer-based patient record (CPR) systems. An ActiveGuideline is an HTML document containing special tags that are interpreted by a CPR as actions (e.g., medication order, test order, referral, patient instructions). In our usage scenario, the CPR automatically displays ActiveGuidelines relevant to the current patient context. After reviewing the guideline, the user selects recommended orders directly from the ActiveGuideline. The selected orders are automatically transmitted to the CPR and executed as regular orders. An ActiveGuideline editor facilitates easy conversion of existing HTML-formatted guidelines into ActiveGuidelines. We believe that integrating patient-specific ActiveGuidelines within a CPR system will improve utilization of clinical guidelines in routine patient care.

Indexed as

InternetPractice Guidelines as TopicSystems IntegrationComputer SystemsDecision Making, Computer-AssistedHumansHypermediaMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedSoftware

Identifiers

PMID11080003
PMCPMC2243807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.