ArticleProceedings. AMIA Symposium2000
An evaluation of patient access to their electronic medical records via the World Wide Web.
Article in Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimization of infobutton design and Implementation: A systematic review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIATrial
- Precision and Virtual Care.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024Article
- Socio-demographic psychosocial and clinical characteristics of participants in e-HealthyStrides©: an interactive ehealth program to improve diabetes self-management skills.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2011Article
- The anxious wait: assessing the impact of patient accessible EHRs for breast cancer patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2010Article
- Is Canada ready for patient accessible electronic health records? A national scan.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2008Article
- The role of patients in designing health information systems: the case of applying simulation techniques to design an electronic patient record (EPR) interface.Health care management science · 2004Article
- What do we mean by Internet access? A framework for health researchers.Preventing chronic disease · 2004Article
- Personal health records: evaluation of functionality and utility.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper describes initial experience with the Web-based Patient Clinical Information System (PatCIS). The system was designed to serve as a framework for the integration of applications that help patients access their electronic medical record, add data to their record, review on-line health information, and apply their own clinical data (automatically) to guideline programs that offer health advice. The architecture supports security functions and records user activities, relieving application developers from concerns about safe information practices and the evaluation process. PatCIS is being used to study the social and cognitive impact of allowing patients to have access to their health records via the Web. To date, PatCIS has grown to include 15 clinical functions and 4 dynamic links to literature (called infobuttons). Eleven patients have been enrolled since April, 1999; five have been active users. Experience shows that the PatCIS architecture supports application integration while providing adequate security and evaluation functions. Initial caution with the patient enrollment process has limited recruitment and, consequently, usage. However, experience thus far suggests that PatCIS has good usability and utility. No adverse events, including undesirable impact on doctor-patient interactions, have been reported. There do not appear to be any technical impediments to scaling up the enrollment to continue to observe patient usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11079863PMC2244037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.