Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11073211›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2000

Evolution of four types of RNA editing in myxomycetes.

T L Horton, L F Landweber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. When you can't trust the DNA: RNA editing changes transcript sequences.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T L HortonDepartment of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544, USA.
L F Landweber
Princeton University · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING COMPLEX GENE EDITING SYSTEMS IN PROTISTSR01GM059708 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI LANDWEBER, LAURA F · 1999 to 2016
$4.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM59708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The myxomycete Physarum polycephalum requires extensive RNA editing to create functional mitochondrial transcripts. The cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (col) transcript exhibits a combination of editing forms not found together in any other eukaryotic RNA: 66 insertions of ribonucleotides (59 Cs, a single U, and three mixed dinucleotides) as well as base conversion of four Cs to Us (Gott et al., J Biol Chem, 1993, 268:25483-25486). Through a phylogenetic survey of col DNA genes and RNA transcripts in representative myxomycetes, we have decoupled the four types of editing in this lineage. Some myxomycetes share insertional editing with P. polycephalum, yet lack C--> U conversion, consistent with previous reports of separation of insertional and base conversion editing in P. polycephalum extracts (Visomirski-Robic & Gott, RNA, 1995, 3:821-837). Most remarkably, we detect unique evolutionary histories of the three different types of insertional editing, though these have been indistinguishable in vitro. For example, Clastoderma debaryanum exhibits insertions of Us, but not Cs or dinucleotides.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceElectron Transport Complex IVMolecular Sequence DataMyxomycetesPhylogenyPhysarum polycephalumPolymerase Chain ReactionProtein SubunitsRNA EditingSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAElectron Transport Complex IVProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID11073211
PMCPMC1370006
OpenAlexW2148603391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.