Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11071227›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2000

Physicians' perceptions of the changing health care system: comparisons by gender and specialties.

M Hojat, J S Gonnella, J B Erdmann, J J Veloski, D Z Louis, T J Nasca, S L Rattner

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Work Motivation among Occupational Therapy Graduates in Malaysia.Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT · 2017
    Article
  4. Nursing interventions to promote dignified dying in South Korea.International journal of palliative nursing · 2011
    Article
  5. Organizational ethics, change, and stakeholder involvement: a survey of physicians.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2007
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M HojatCenter for Research in Medical Education and Health Care, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-5083, USA.
J S Gonnella
J B Erdmann
J J Veloski
D Z Louis
T J Nasca
S L Rattner
Jefferson College · US

Funding

CENTERS FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION RESEARCHU76MB000002 · MB · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI VELOSKI, JON · 1995 to 1997
–
BHP HRSA HHS 1 U76 MB00002-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate physicians' perceptions of changes in the United States health care system impacting academic medicine, quality of care, patient referrals, cost, ethical and sociopolitical aspects of medicine. A survey was mailed in 1998 to 1,272 physicians (graduates of Jefferson Medical (College between 1987 and 1992); 835 physicians (66%) responded. Results showed that a substantial majority (92%) believed that learning to work in a managed care environment should become an essential component of medical education. Physicians perceived that current changes impair physicians' autonomy (94%), and restrain physicians' freedom to provide optimal care (84%). A sizable majority (76%) endorsed patients' freedom to seek specialist care, and 55% believed that capitation reduces physicians' motivation for long-term monitoring of patients. The majority endorsed universal health coverage (80%), and agreed to support rather than resist the changes (62%). Only 18% hold a positive view of the changes in the future. The majority believed that medical education should prepare physicians to provide end-of-life care (92%), and that organized medicine should take a stand on social issues that can influence the well-being of society (79%). Only 34% endorsed the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. No gender differences were observed, but a few differences were found between generalists and specialists. Results can help in understanding physicians' perceptions of current changes in the United States health care system, and in providing guidelines for the development of educational programs to prepare physicians to face new challenges.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelOrganizational InnovationAdultDelivery of Health CareEthics, MedicalFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedicineMenPhysiciansPhysicians, WomenQuality of Health CareReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID11071227
OpenAlexW1552680454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.