ArticleAnnals of surgery2000
Logistics and technique for procurement of intestinal, pancreatic, and hepatic grafts from the same donor.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines for the assessment and acceptance of potential brain-dead organ donors.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva · 2016Guideline
- Celsior versus University of Wisconsin preserving solutions for liver transplantation: postreperfusion syndrome and outcome of a 5-year prospective randomized controlled study.World journal of surgery · 2011Trial
- Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: Where We Stand Today.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Review
- Intestinal Donation and Utilization: Single-Center Analysis Within Eurotransplant.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Article
- Characterizing Autophagy in the Cold Ischemic Injury of Small Bowel Grafts: Evidence from Rat Jejunum.Metabolites · 2021Article
- [Procurement of abdominal organs].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Article
- Current status of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation.Gastroenterology report · 2017Review
- Extracorporeal Hypothermic Perfusion Device for Intestinal Graft Preservation to Decrease Ischemic Injury During Transportation.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Article
- The concept of gut rehabilitation and the future of visceral transplantation.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2015Review
- [Technique of liver procurement in postmortem donation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2013Review
- Multivisceral transplantation: expanding indications and improving outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013Article
- Intestinal transplantation in children: a review of immunotherapy regimens.Paediatric drugs · 2011Review
- Current perspectives on pediatric intestinal transplantation.Current gastroenterology reports · 2009Review
- Auxiliary en-bloc liver-small bowel transplantation with partial pancreas preservation in pigs.World journal of gastroenterology · 2004Article
- Pancreatic transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh.Clinical transplants · 2004Article
- Modified technique for combined liver-small bowel transplantation in pigs.World journal of gastroenterology · 2003Article
- Small intestinal transplantation.Current gastroenterology reports · 2001Review
- Clinical intestinal transplantation: a decade of experience at a single center.Annals of surgery · 2001Article
- Ninety-five cases of intestinal transplantation at the University of Miami.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary TractArticle
- Organ Procurement in the Brain Dead Donors Without In Vivo Cold Perfusion: A Novel Technique.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess a technique for simultaneous recovery of the intestine, pancreas, and liver from the same donor. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With the more frequent use of pancreatic and intestinal transplantation, a procurement procedure is needed that permits retrieval of both organs as well as the liver from the same cadaveric donor for transplantation to different recipients. It is believed by many procurement officers and surgeons, however, that this objective is not technically feasible.
methodsA technique for simultaneous recovery of the intestine, pancreas, and liver was used in 13 multiorgan cadaver donors during a 26-month period, with transplantation of the organs to 33 recipients. The intestine was removed from 11 donors separately and in continuity with the pancreas in the other 2. Six additional pancreases were excised and transplanted separately. Thirteen livers were retrieved, one of which was discarded because of steatorrhea. Ten of the remaining 12 livers were transplanted intact; the other 2 were split in situ and used as reduced-size hepatic allografts in four recipients.
resultsNone of the 11 intestinal, 6 pancreatic, 2 intestinal-pancreatic, or 14 whole or partial liver allografts sustained serious ischemic injury or were lost as a result of technical complications. One liver recipient died 25 months after surgery of recurrent C virus hepatitis. The other 32 recipients had adequate allograft function with a mean follow-up of 8 months.
conclusionIt was possible using the described technique to retrieve intestine, pancreas, and liver allografts safely from the same donor and to transplant these organs to different recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.