Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11066016›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology2000

Efficient recovery of DNA from peripheral blood for diagnostic analysis with a vacuum manifold.

S M Kukuczka, L E Grosso

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S M KukuczkaDepartment of Pathology, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63104, USA. grossol@slucare1.sluh.edu
L E Grosso
Saint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing clinical use of diagnostic DNA mutation analysis requires efficient isolation of DNA from peripheral blood. METHODS AND

resultsThe use of a vacuum manifold to isolate DNA was evaluated and compared with a similar centrifugation-based DNA isolation technique. In PCR-based assays of five-point mutations, identical results were obtained with DNA isolated from peripheral blood using either centrifugation or a vacuum system. Minor modifications to PCR procedures were encountered.

conclusionsIn the clinical setting, this vacuum-driven method of DNA isolation provides an efficient, useful alternative to conventional centrifugation-based DNA isolation from peripheral-blood specimens. Providing sufficient, stable DNA for multiple assays, it is easily implemented without highly specialized, expensive equipment and decreases the time spent isolating DNA from multiple samples. In addition, the potential for specimen contamination is reduced because there are fewer transfer steps.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionDNAHumansPoint MutationSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingTime FactorsDNA

Identifiers

PMID11066016
OpenAlexW1963756407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.