ArticleGenetics2000
Bayesian analysis of mutational spectra.
Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bayesian Framework for Inferring the Influence of Sequence Context on Point Mutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Mutagenicity of furan in female Big Blue B6C3F1 mice.Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis · 2014Article
- A conditional predictive p-value to compare a multinomial with an overdispersed multinomial in the analysis of T-cell populations.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- Mutational fingerprints of aging.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies that examine both the frequency of gene mutation and the pattern or spectrum of mutational changes can be used to identify chemical mutagens and to explore the molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis. In this article, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach for the analysis of mutational spectra. We assume that the total number of independent mutations and the numbers of mutations falling into different response categories, defined by location within a gene and/or type of alteration, follow binomial and multinomial sampling distributions, respectively. We use prior distributions to summarize past information about the overall mutation frequency and the probabilities corresponding to the different mutational categories. These priors can be chosen on the basis of data from previous studies using an approach that accounts for heterogeneity among studies. Inferences about the overall mutation frequency, the proportions of mutations in each response category, and the category-specific mutation frequencies can be based on posterior distributions, which incorporate past and current data on the mutant frequency and on DNA sequence alterations. Methods are described for comparing groups and for assessing dose-related trends. We illustrate our approach using data from the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.