Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11063675›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

Synthetic interactions of the post-Golgi sec mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

F P Finger, P Novick

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regulation of yeast polarized exocytosis by phosphoinositide lipids.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Actin acting at the Golgi.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Yeast Sec1p functions before and after vesicle docking.Molecular biology of the cell · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F P FingerDepartment of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8002, USA.
P Novick
Yale University · US

Funding

GENETICS OF SECRETION IN YEASTR01GM035370 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PETER Jay NOVICK · 1985 to 2026
$7.0M
Genetics of Secretion in YeastR37GM035370 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NOVICK, PETER JAY · 2001 to 2010
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM35370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, synthetic lethality has been extensively used both to characterize interactions between genes previously identified as likely to be involved in similar processes as well as to uncover new interactions. We have performed a large study of the synthetic lethal interactions of the post-Golgi sec mutations. Included in this study are the interactions of the post-Golgi sec mutations with each other, with mutations affecting earlier stages of the secretory pathway, with selected mutations affecting the actin cytoskeleton, and with selected cell division cycle (cdc) mutations affecting processes thought to be important for or involving secretion, such as polarity establishment and cytokinesis. Synthetic negative interactions of the post-Golgi sec mutations appear (as predicted) to be largely stage specific, although there are some notable exceptions. The significance of these results is discussed in the context of both secretory pathway function and the utility of synthetic lethality studies and their interpretation.

Indexed as

MutationCell CycleFungal ProteinsGenes, FungalGenes, LethalGenotypeGolgi ApparatusSaccharomyces cerevisiaeFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11063675
PMCPMC1461333
OpenAlexW1942681839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.