Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11063129›Full record

ReviewCell proliferation2000

Cell cycle checkpoints and their inactivation in human cancer.

M Molinari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell proliferation, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 386 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Inhibition of WEE1 Is Effective inJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Functionalized Nanomaterials in Cancer Treatment: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Gintonin-EnrichedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Elucidation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M MolinariEuropean Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy. mmolinari@ieo.it
European Institute of Oncology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoints are mechanisms that regulate progression through the cell cycle insuring that each step takes place only once and in the right sequence. Mutations of checkpoint proteins are frequent in all types of cancer as defects in cell cycle control can lead to genetic instability. This review will focus on three major areas of cell cycle transition control, with particular attention to the alterations found in human cancer. These areas include the G1/S transition, where most cancer-related defects occur, the G2/M checkpoint and its activation in response to DNA damage, and the spindle checkpoint.

Indexed as

G1 PhaseG2 PhaseGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsS PhaseNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11063129
PMCPMC6496592
OpenAlexW2129695021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.