Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11062052›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2000

Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness.

J W Brunger, G S Murray, M O'Riordan, A L Matthews, R J Smith, N H Robin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetic testing hearing loss: The challenge of non syndromic mimics.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Carrier testing in children: exploration of genetic health professionals' practices in Australia.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J W BrungerDepartment of Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA.
G S Murray
M O'Riordan
A L Matthews
R J Smith
N H Robin
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

NONSYNDROMIC HEARING LOSS--A COLLABORATIVE STUDYR01DC002842 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SMITH, RICHARD J.H. · 1996 to 2024
$12.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC02842NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent molecular genetic advances have resulted in genetic testing becoming an option for deaf individuals and their families. However, there is little information about the interest in such testing. To investigate this issue, parents with normal hearing who have one or more deaf children were surveyed about their attitudes toward diagnostic, carrier, and prenatal genetic testing for deafness. This population was chosen because it represents the majority of individuals who are encountered in clinical practice, given that 90%-95% of deaf individuals are born to persons with normal hearing. Of 328 surveys distributed, 96 were completed and returned. Of the respondents, 96% recorded a positive attitude toward genetic testing for deafness, including prenatal testing, although none would use this information to terminate an affected pregnancy. All respondents had a poor understanding of genetics, with 98% both incorrectly estimating the recurrence risk of deafness and misunderstanding the concept of inheritance. Notably, these findings were similar in the group who had had genetic testing for their children and in the group who had not, suggesting either that the parents who received genetic testing did not receive genetic counseling or that the counseling was not effective. On the basis of these results, it was concluded that this population is interested in the use of genetic testing and that testing should not be done without first providing formal genetic counseling. Appropriate counseling can help parents to understand the risks, benefits, and limitations of genetic testing.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdultAge of OnsetChildDeafnessGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansParentsPrenatal DiagnosisSurveys and QuestionnairesEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

PMID11062052
PMCPMC1287942
OpenAlexW2142174838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.