Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11060356›Full record

ArticleJournal of lipid research2000

Lipoprotein lipase- and hepatic triglyceride lipase- promoted very low density lipoprotein degradation proceeds via an apolipoprotein E-dependent mechanism.

J D Medh, G L Fry, S L Bowen, S Ruben, H Wong, D A Chappell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of lipid research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Maternal loading with very low-density lipoproteins stimulates fetal surfactant synthesis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J D MedhDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
G L Fry
S L Bowen
S Ruben
H Wong
D A Chappell
University of Iowa · USLucid Technologies (United States) · USWest Los Angeles College · US

Funding

REGULATION OF TG RICH LIPOPROTEIN SECRETION BY OXIDIZED LIPIDSP01HL049264 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI SPECTOR, ARTHUR A. · 1992 to 2001
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL49264NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL049264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is the primary recognition signal on triglyceride-rich lipoproteins responsible for interacting with low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors and LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). It has been shown that lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase (HTGL) promote receptor-mediated uptake and degradation of very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and remnant particles, possibly by directly binding to lipoprotein receptors. In this study we have investigated the requirement for apoE in lipase-stimulated VLDL degradation. We compared binding and degradation of normal and apoE-depleted human VLDL and apoE knockout mouse VLDL in human foreskin fibroblasts. Surface binding at 37 degrees C of apoE knockout VLDL was greater than that of normal VLDL by 3- and 40-fold, respectively, in the presence of LPL and HTGL. In spite of the greater stimulation of surface binding, lipase-stimulated degradation of apoE knockout mouse VLDL was significantly lower than that of normal VLDL (30, 30, and 80%, respectively, for control, LPL, and HTGL treatments). In the presence of LPL and HTGL, surface binding of apoE-depleted human VLDL was, respectively, 40 and 200% of normal VLDL whereas degradation was, respectively, 25 and 50% of normal VLDL. LPL and HTGL stimulated degradation of normal VLDL in a dose-dependent manner and by a LDL receptor-mediated pathway. Maximum stimulation (4-fold) was seen in the presence LPL (1 microgram/ml) or HTGL (3 microgram/ml) in lovastatin-treated cells. On the other hand, degradation of apoE-depleted VLDL was not significantly increased by the presence of lipases even in lovastatin-treated cells. Surface binding of apoE-depleted VLDL to metabolically inactive cells at 4 degrees C was higher in control and HTGL-treated cells, but unchanged in the presence of LPL. Degradation of prebound apoE-depleted VLDL was only 35% as efficient as that of normal VLDL. Surface binding of apoE knockout or apoE-depleted VLDL was to heparin sulfate proteoglycans because it was completely abolished by heparinase treatment. However, apoE appears to be a primary determinant for receptor-mediated VLDL degradation. Our studies suggest that overexpression of LPL or HTGL may not protect against lipoprotein accumulation seen in apoE deficiency.

Indexed as

AnimalsApolipoproteins ECattleEmulsionsFat Emulsions, IntravenousFibroblastsHumansLipaseLipoprotein LipaseLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLLipoproteins, VLDLLiverLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1MiceMice, KnockoutApolipoproteins EEmulsionsFat Emulsions, IntravenousLipaseLipoprotein LipaseLipoproteins, HDLLipoproteins, LDLLipoproteins, VLDLLow Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1Receptors, ImmunologicReceptors, LDLTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID11060356
PMCPMC2759277
OpenAlexW2162382529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.