Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11060076›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

PCR detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 directly from stools: evaluation of commercial extraction methods for purifying fecal DNA.

J L Holland, L Louie, A E Simor, M Louie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Rapid detection of pathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Foodborne illnesses ofJournal of food science and technology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Whatman Protein Saver Cards for Storage and Detection of Parasitic Enteropathogens.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  18. CPHLN recommendations for the laboratory detection of Shiga toxin-producingCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparison of two methods for detection ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J L HollandDepartment of Microbiology, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
L Louie
A E Simor
M Louie
Health Sciences Centre · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 is important for patient management and for prompt epidemiological investigations. We evaluated one in-house method and three commercially available kits for their ability to extract E. coli O157:H7 DNA directly from stool specimens for PCR. Of the 153 stool specimens tested, 107 were culture positive and 46 were culture negative. The sensitivities and specificities of the in-house enrichment method, IsoQuick kit, NucliSens kit, and QIAamp kit were comparable, as follows: 83 and 98%, 85 and 100%, 74 and 98%, and 86 and 100%, respectively. False-negative PCR results may be due to the presence of either inherent inhibitors or small numbers of organisms. The presence of large amounts of bacteria relative to the amount of the E. coli O157:H7 target may result in the lower sensitivities of the assays. All commercial kits were rapid and easy to use, although DNA extracted with the QIAamp kit did not require further dilution of the DNA template prior to PCR.

Indexed as

Culture MediaDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli O157FecesHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityCulture MediaDNA, BacterialReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID11060076
PMCPMC87549
OpenAlexW2134990479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.