Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11059790›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2000

The endosomal-lysosomal system of neurons in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis: a review.

R A Nixon, A M Cataldo, P M Mathews

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The history of Down syndrome-associated Alzheimer's disease; past, present, and future.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In 2024, theFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R A NixonCenter for Dementia Research, Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York 10962, USA. nixon@nki.rfmh.org
A M Cataldo
P M Mathews

Funding

Uncovering Alzheimer's disease risk mechanisms through neuron-specific analysis of autophagy and endosomal-lysosomal functionP01AG017617 · NIA · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI NIXON, RALPH A. · 2000 to 2021
$40.0M
ENDOCYTIC PATHWAY IN ALZHEIMERS DISEASER29AG014726 · NIA · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI CATALDO, ANNE M. · 1997 to 2001
$211k
NIA NIH HHS AG1 4726NIA NIH HHS P01 AG17617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A prominent feature of brain pathology in Alzheimer's disease is a robust activation of the neuronal lysosomal system and major cellular pathways converging on the lysosome, namely, endocytosis and autophagy. Recent studies that identify a disturbance of the endocytic pathway as one of the earliest known manifestation of Alzheimer's disease provide insight into how beta-amyloidogenesis might be promoted in sporadic Alzheimer's disease, the most prevalent and least well understood form of the disease. Primary lysosomal dysfunction has historically been linked to neurodegeneration. New data now directly implicate cathepsins as proteases capable of initiating, as well as executing, cell death programs in certain pathologic states. These and other studies support the view that the progressive alterations of lysosomal function observed during aging and Alzheimer's disease contribute importantly to the neurodegenerative process in Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsBrainEndocytosisEndosomesHumansLysosomesNeurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.