Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11053141›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2000

Multimerization-cyclization of DNA fragments as a method of conformational analysis.

A A Podtelezhnikov, C Mao, N C Seeman, A Vologodskii

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bullied no more: when and how DNA shoves proteins around.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2012
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sequence dependence of DNA bending rigidity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  11. DNA curvature and flexibility in vitro and in vivo.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2010
    Review
  12. Simulation of DNA catenanes.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2009
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Poly(dA:dT) tracts: major determinants of nucleosome organization.Current opinion in structural biology · 2009
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CRANKITE: A fast polypeptide backbone conformation sampler.Source code for biology and medicine · 2008
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cyclization of short DNA fragments and bending fluctuations of the double helix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A A PodtelezhnikovDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
C Mao
N C Seeman
A Vologodskii
New York University · US

Funding

DNA CATENANES AND TYPE II DNA TOPOISOMERASESR01GM054215 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI VOLOGODSKII, ALEXANDER V · 1996 to 2010
$2.8M
Physical Chemistry of Recombinational IntermediatesR37GM029554 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SEEMAN, NADRIAN C. · 2005 to 2012
$2.7M
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF RECOMBINATIONAL INTERMEDIATESR01GM029554 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI SEEMAN, NADRIAN C. · 1985 to 2004
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-29554NIGMS NIH HHS GM-54215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ligation of short DNA fragments results in the formation of linear and circular multimers of various lengths. The distribution of products in such a reaction is often used to evaluate fragment bending caused by specific chemical modification, by bound ligands or by the presence of irregular structural elements. We have developed a more rigorous quantitative approach to the analysis of such experimental data based on determination of j-factors for different multimers from the distribution of the reaction products. j-Factors define the effective concentration of one end of a linear chain in the vicinity of the other end. To extract j-factors we assumed that kinetics of the reaction is described by a system of differential equations where j-factors appear as coefficients. The assumption was confirmed by comparison with experimental data obtained here for DNA fragments containing A-tracts. At the second step of the analysis j-factors are used to determine conformational parameters of DNA fragments: the equilibrium bend angle, the bending rigidity of the fragment axis, and the total twist of the fragments. This procedure is based on empirical equations that connect the conformational parameters with the set of j-factors. To obtain the equations, we computed j-factors for a large array of conformational parameters that describe model fragments. The approach was tested on both simulated and actual experimental data for DNA fragments containing A-tracts. A-tract DNA bend angle determined here is in good agreement with previously published data. We have established a set of experimental conditions necessary for the data analysis to be successful.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBase SequenceBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsDNADNA, CircularModels, ChemicalMonte Carlo MethodDNADNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID11053141
PMCPMC1301149
OpenAlexW2167029856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.