Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11050793›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2000

The future general practitioner: out of date and running out of time.

T Lipman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medical generalism in a modern NHS: preparing for a turbulent future.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A case of mural dyslexia.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

T LipmanWesterhope Medical Group, Newcastle upon Tyne. toby@tobylipm.demon.co.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the late 1960s a Royal College of General Practitioners' working party produced a job description for the 'Future General Practitioner', together with an educational programme for vocational training. Despite the perceived success of vocational training, general practice remains academically disadvantaged compared with hospital medicine. Most general practitioners (GPs) have no contact with research or academic general practice, few achieve higher degrees compared with hospital consultants, and there are few academic posts in general practice. Junior doctors perceive general practice as offering less intrinsic job satisfaction than hospital medicine and recruitment is falling. Registrars who have completed vocational training are reluctant to commit themselves to general practice and often drift away from it. Schemes with an academic content, designed to retain doctors in general practice, have been well received but there are few career posts in academic general practice. Primary care groups and clinical governance will radically change the nature of general practice. GPs will no longer be at the centre of the primary health care team. Primary care trusts, serving populations of 100,000 or more at multiple sites, will still employ doctors but much of the traditional GP workload will be undertaken by nurses. Present day vocational training produces GPs without the skills that future 'community generalists' will need. Their training will be longer and their careers more structured than at present. They will use evidence-based practice routinely and be experts in information management, interpreting and managing complex diagnostic and therapeutic problems in the context of rapidly changing health technology.

Indexed as

ForecastingCareer ChoiceEvidence-Based MedicineFamily PracticeHumansJob DescriptionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality of Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID11050793
PMCPMC1313805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.