Trial reportThorax2000
Randomized controlled trial of supported discharge in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Trial report in Thorax, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- What is the evidence for virtual wards or hospital-at-home care pathways for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Virtual healthcare compared to hospital care for acute and post-acute illness in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Inpatient-level care at home delivered by virtual wards and hospital at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of complex interventions and their components.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The effect of telemedicine employing telemonitoring instruments on readmissions of patients with heart failure and/or COPD: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Pooled it
- Enhancing potential impact of hospital discharge interventions for patients with COPD: a qualitative systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009Pooled it
- Intermediate care--Hospital-at-Home in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: British Thoracic Society guideline.Thorax · 2007Guideline
- Hospital at home for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review of evidence.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Pooled it
- Randomised controlled trial of home based care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2002Pooled it
- Trial
- Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease feel safe when treated at home: a qualitative study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2012Trial
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early assisted discharge for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: the design of a randomised controlled trial.BMC public health · 2010Trial
- Trial
- A Literature Review on the Coexisting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Heart Failure.Cureus · 2023Review
- Cost of home hospitalization versus inpatient hospitalization inclusive of a 30-day post-acute period.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Observational
- Admission prevention in COPD: non-pharmacological management.BMC medicine · 2013Review
- A qualitative study of stakeholder views of a community-based anticipatory care service for patients with COPD.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA randomised trial was performed on patients presenting to hospital with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to compare outcomes in those managed at home with support with those admitted to hospital in the standard manner.
methodsOver an 18 month period all patients presenting to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh on weekdays (n=718) with a diagnosis of an exacerbation of COPD were assessed for inclusion in the trial. Patients with impaired level of consciousness, acute confusion, acute changes on radiography, or an arterial pH of <7.35 or with other serious medical or social reasons for admission were excluded. Patients randomised to home support were discharged with an appropriate treatment package (antibiotics, corticosteroids, nebulised bronchodilators and, if necessary, home oxygen). They were visited by a nurse the following day and thereafter at intervals of 2-3 days until recovery when they were discharged from follow up. Parallel observations were made on patients allocated to normal hospital admission up to the point of discharge. Patients in both groups were assessed at home eight weeks after the initial assessment.
resultsAmong weekday patients 353 (50%) were considered obligatory admissions, 140 (19%) were admitted because of co-morbidity, 17 (2%) because of poor social circumstances, and 24 (3%) did not consent to the trial. The remaining 184 (26%) were randomised (2:1) either to home support or to a standard hospital admission. The median time to discharge was 7 days for the home support group and 5 days for the admitted group (p<0.01); 25% of the home support group and 34% of the admitted group were readmitted before the final assessment at eight weeks (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in attendances by GPs and carers or in health status measured eight weeks after the initial assessment. Satisfaction with the service was good. The mean total health service cost per patient was estimated as 877 pounds sterling for the home support group and 1753 pounds sterling for the admitted group.
conclusionsThis study shows that home supported discharge is a well tolerated, safe, and economic alternative to hospital admission for a proportion of patients referred to hospital for admission for an exacerbation of COPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.