Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11050258›Full record

Trial reportThorax2000

Randomized controlled trial of supported discharge in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

E Skwarska, G Cohen, K M Skwarski, C Lamb, D Bushell, S Parker, W MacNee

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thorax, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  9. Avoiding hospital admission through provision of hospital care at home: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. A qualitative study of stakeholder views of a community-based anticipatory care service for patients with COPD.Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E SkwarskaRespiratory Medicine Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
G Cohen
K M Skwarski
C Lamb
D Bushell
S Parker
W MacNee

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA randomised trial was performed on patients presenting to hospital with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to compare outcomes in those managed at home with support with those admitted to hospital in the standard manner.

methodsOver an 18 month period all patients presenting to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh on weekdays (n=718) with a diagnosis of an exacerbation of COPD were assessed for inclusion in the trial. Patients with impaired level of consciousness, acute confusion, acute changes on radiography, or an arterial pH of <7.35 or with other serious medical or social reasons for admission were excluded. Patients randomised to home support were discharged with an appropriate treatment package (antibiotics, corticosteroids, nebulised bronchodilators and, if necessary, home oxygen). They were visited by a nurse the following day and thereafter at intervals of 2-3 days until recovery when they were discharged from follow up. Parallel observations were made on patients allocated to normal hospital admission up to the point of discharge. Patients in both groups were assessed at home eight weeks after the initial assessment.

resultsAmong weekday patients 353 (50%) were considered obligatory admissions, 140 (19%) were admitted because of co-morbidity, 17 (2%) because of poor social circumstances, and 24 (3%) did not consent to the trial. The remaining 184 (26%) were randomised (2:1) either to home support or to a standard hospital admission. The median time to discharge was 7 days for the home support group and 5 days for the admitted group (p<0.01); 25% of the home support group and 34% of the admitted group were readmitted before the final assessment at eight weeks (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in attendances by GPs and carers or in health status measured eight weeks after the initial assessment. Satisfaction with the service was good. The mean total health service cost per patient was estimated as 877 pounds sterling for the home support group and 1753 pounds sterling for the admitted group.

conclusionsThis study shows that home supported discharge is a well tolerated, safe, and economic alternative to hospital admission for a proportion of patients referred to hospital for admission for an exacerbation of COPD.

Indexed as

Patient DischargeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDelivery of Health CareFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHumansLung Diseases, ObstructiveMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionScotlandTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID11050258
PMCPMC1745644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.