Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11042915›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2000

Management of urinary tract infection in general practice: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

E A Fenwick, A H Briggs, C I Hawke

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infection with miniaturised point-of-care cultivation on a dipstick.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of genomics · 2024
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E A FenwickCentre for Health Economics, University of York. ealf100@york.ac.uk
A H Briggs
C I Hawke
University of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptoms associated with urinary tract infection (UTI) are common in women in general practice and represent a significant burden for the National Health Service. There is considerable variation among general practitioners in the management of patients presenting with these symptoms.

aimTo identify the most appropriate patient management strategy given current information for non-pregnant, adult women presenting in general practice with symptoms of uncomplicated UTI.

methodA decision analytic model incorporating a variety of patient management strategies was constructed using available published information and expert opinion. This model was able to provide guidance on current best practice based upon cost-effectiveness (cost per symptom-free day).

resultsEmpiric treatment was found to be the least costly strategy available. It saved two days of symptoms per episode of UTI at a cost of 14 Pounds. The empiric-and-laboratory strategy involves an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 215 Pounds per symptom day averted per episode of UTI. The remaining patient management strategies are never optimal.

conclusionEmpiric treatment of patients presenting with symptoms of UTI was found to be cost-effective under a range of assumptions for this patient group. However, recognition of the impact of this strategy upon antibiotic resistance may lead to the dipstick strategy being considered a superior strategy overall.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Resistance, MicrobialFamily PracticeFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeUrinary Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID11042915
PMCPMC1313774
OpenAlexW2096410209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.