Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11042691›Full record

ArticleOncogene2000

Age-dependent spontaneous mutagenesis in Xpc mice defective in nucleotide excision repair.

S W Wijnhoven, H J Kool, L H Mullenders, A A van Zeeland, E C Friedberg, G T van der Horst, H van Steeg, H Vrieling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Caloric restriction and genomic stability.Nucleic acids research · 2007
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Deletion of XPC leads to lung tumors in mice and is associated with early events in human lung carcinogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

S W WijnhovenDepartment of Radiation Genetics and Chemical Mutagenesis-MGC, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 AL Leiden, The Netherlands.
H J Kool
L H Mullenders
A A van Zeeland
E C Friedberg
G T van der Horst
H van Steeg
H Vrieling
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damages caused by cellular metabolites and environmental agents induce mutations, that may predispose to cancer. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major cellular defence mechanism acting on a variety of DNA lesions. Here, we show that spontaneous mutant frequencies at the Hprt gene increased 30-fold in T-lymphocytes of 1 year old Xpc-/- mice, possessing only functional transcription-coupled repair (TCR). Hprt mutant frequencies in Xpa-/- and Csb-/- mice that both have a defect in this NER subpathway, remained low during ageing. In contrast to current models, the elevated mutation rate in Xpc-/- mice does not lead to an increased tumour incidence or premature ageing. Oncogene (2000) 19, 5034 - 5037

Indexed as

MutagenesisAgingAnimalsDNA RepairFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHypoxanthine PhosphoribosyltransferaseMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicNeoplasms, ExperimentalSpleenT-LymphocytesTranscription, GeneticHypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase

Identifiers

PMID11042691
OpenAlexW2319228790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.