Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11042149›Full record

ArticleGenome research2000

Reading between the LINEs: human genomic variation induced by LINE-1 retrotransposition.

F M Sheen, S T Sherry, G M Risch, M Robichaux, I Nasidze, M Stoneking, M A Batzer, G D Swergold

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mobile genomics: tools and techniques for tackling transposons.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Human transposon insertion profiling by sequencing (TIPseq) to map LINE-1 insertions in single cells.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Human transposon insertion profiling: Analysis, visualization and identification of somatic LINE-1 insertions in ovarian cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

F M SheenPromega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, USA.
S T Sherry
G M Risch
M Robichaux
I Nasidze
M Stoneking
M A Batzer
G D Swergold
Promega (United States) · US

Funding

MODELING ANCIENT POPULATION SIZES WITH ALU ELEMENTSF32GM019110 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC NEW ORLEANS · PI SHERRY, STEPHEN T · 1997 to 1998
–
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM019110NIGMS NIH HHS GM19110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insertion of mobile elements into the genome represents a new class of genetic markers for the study of human evolution. Long interspersed elements (LINEs) have amplified to a copy number of about 100,000 over the last 100 million years of mammalian evolution and comprise approximately 15% of the human genome. The majority of LINE-1 (L1) elements within the human genome are 5' truncated copies of a few active L1 elements that are capable of retrotransposition. Some of the young L1 elements have inserted into the human genome so recently that populations are polymorphic for the presence of an L1 element at a particular chromosomal location. L1 insertion polymorphisms offer several advantages over other types of polymorphisms for human evolution studies. First, they are typed by rapid, simple, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays. Second, they are stable polymorphisms that rarely undergo deletion. Third, the presence of an L1 element represents identity by descent, because the probability is negligible that two different young L1 repeats would integrate independently between the exact same two nucleotides. Fourth, the ancestral state of L1 insertion polymorphisms is known to be the absence of the L1 element, which can be used to root plots/trees of population relationships. Here we report the development of a PCR-based display for the direct identification of dimorphic L1 elements from the human genome. We have also developed PCR-based assays for the characterization of six polymorphic L1 elements within the human genome. PCR analysis of human/rodent hybrid cell line DNA samples showed that the polymorphic L1 elements were located on several different chromosomes. Phylogenetic analysis of nonhuman primate DNA samples showed that all of the recently integrated "young" L1 elements were restricted to the human genome and absent from the genomes of nonhuman primates. Analysis of a diverse array of human populations showed that the allele frequencies and level of heterozygosity for each of the L1 elements was variable. Polymorphic L1 elements represent a new source of identical-by-descent variation for the study of human evolution. [The sequence data described in this paper have been submitted to the GenBank data library under accession nos. AF242435-AF242451.]

Indexed as

Genome, HumanGenomicsAnimalsBlotting, SouthernCell LineFemaleGene DosageGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationHeLa CellsHumansLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsMaleMiceMolecular Sequence DataPolymorphism, GeneticGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID11042149
PMCPMC310943
OpenAlexW2141382746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.